Chainlink and Swift Partner with UBS to Advance Tokenized Fund Workflows
Tokenization is no longer just theory—it’s being tested in real financial workflows. Chainlink and Swift have teamed up with UBS Tokenize to pilot a system that lets banks handle fund subscriptions and redemptions onchain, all without ripping out existing infrastructure. By combining Swift’s trusted messaging network with Chainlink’s smart contract environment, the collaboration shows how the $100 trillion fund industry could start moving toward blockchain efficiency without breaking legacy systems.
A New Step in Chainlink–Swift Collaboration
Chainlink and Swift have taken their partnership further by piloting a new system with UBS Tokenize, the in-house tokenization arm of UBS. The initiative enables financial institutions to run subscription and redemption workflows for tokenized funds directly from their existing systems. Instead of forcing banks and asset managers to overhaul infrastructure, the integration uses Swift’s financial messaging network and Chainlink’s Runtime Environment (CRE) to bridge legacy systems with blockchain.
How It Works: CRE and Swift Messaging?
The pilot leverages Swift’s ISO 20022 messaging standards and Chainlink’s Digital Transfer Agent (DTA) protocol. Swift messages sent through CRE automatically trigger onchain smart contract events. This allows institutions to manage fund processes like subscriptions and redemptions without building new identity layers or key management frameworks.
Chainlink co-founder Sergey Nazarov called the development a landmark innovation, explaining that it shows how transfer agents and financial institutions can use smart contracts and standardized messaging to manage tokenized assets onchain . UBS, through this pilot, is validating how smart contract–based solutions can be applied to complex fund workflows while keeping existing infrastructure intact.
Why This Matters for the $100 Trillion Fund Industry
The global fund industry is enormous—worth more than $100 trillion. But its processes are often slow, fragmented, and costly to maintain. By presenting a “plug-and-play” model, Chainlink and Swift position this solution as a bridge between the old and new. Institutions can test tokenized products without investing millions into new infrastructure or risking operational disruption. For Swift, which connects over 11,000 institutions across 200 countries, this integration underscores its ambition to remain the backbone of global financial transactions in a tokenized future.
Building on Chainlink’s AI and Corporate Actions Pilot
This pilot comes just days after $LINK announced progress on its AI-driven corporate actions project. That initiative tested how large language models like GPT, Gemini, and Claude could process corporate actions—such as dividend payments or merger updates—into structured, ISO 20022-compliant records sent through Swift. Backers included major clearinghouses and banks such as DTCC, Euroclear, UBS, DBS, and BNP Paribas.
Both the UBS Tokenize and corporate actions pilots highlight how the same Chainlink–Swift infrastructure can be applied across different financial workflows. From funds to corporate events, the goal is to make blockchain and AI practical for traditional institutions.
Swift’s Parallel Blockchain Push
At the same time, Swift is working with Consensys on a blockchain-based shared ledger for cross-border payments. More than 30 global banks, including HSBC, BNP Paribas, and Bank of America , are part of the tests. Swift sees this as a step toward an interoperable, regulated onchain financial system that retains compliance and global standards while unlocking the efficiencies of distributed ledger technology.
The Bigger Picture
What’s unfolding is not a one-off experiment but part of a broader roadmap. $Chainlink is using CRE as a universal adapter, turning Swift’s trusted messaging rails into blockchain triggers. Swift, for its part, is showing regulators and banks that tokenized infrastructure can be adopted without ripping out existing pipes. UBS is proving that large banks can run real pilots on live infrastructure today.
If these efforts scale, the integration could mark one of the most significant shifts in how global finance operates—bridging traditional institutions with the tokenized economy.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Just bet on AI and already faced a market blow! Berkshire reports earnings tonight, Abel faces a major test in his transformation
Greg Abel has been leading Berkshire Hathaway for less than a year, yet he has already made a bet of over $10.9 billion on the AI sector, marking a complete break from Buffett’s traditional avoidance of tech stocks. However, Alphabet’s stock price has fallen below their initial purchase cost, and Bending Spoons continues to decline, putting this bold AI gamble to the test. At the same time, third-quarter earnings per share are expected to drop 6% year-over-year, and the share repurchase program is likely to plummet from $4.5 billion to $1.6 billion. How to deploy $358 billion in cash will be a major challenge for the new leader’s capital allocation skills.

Has the AI bubble burst? Goldman Sachs: It's more like 1998 than 2000 right now
The Goldman Sachs trading desk stated that the current wave of sell-offs resembles the 1998 liquidity crisis more than the bursting of the 2000 bubble. It is a forced deleveraging rather than a refutation of business fundamentals. The market is drastically repricing construction financing and timeline expectations, rather than underlying demand. Moreover, the issues currently drawing the most attention from the market—electricity and licensing—are actually the least important, as limited supply does not equate to disappearing demand. The real question that needs to be answered is whether long-term revenues can ultimately justify the capital invested.

Pundit: XRP and XLM Holders, Do You Know How Big This Is?

Tesla Cybertruck: From Cracked Windows to Production Halt, a Three-and-a-Half Year Journey Ends
Since its launch in 2019, Cybertruck has been mired in controversy—ranging from a failed window demonstration on release day, a four-year delay in mass production, and its price rising from $39,900 to more than $100,000, along with a total of 11 recalls. The day before the halt of production was announced, Tesla raised the price once again, bringing a dramatic and intriguing end to the saga of this vehicle.

