Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
Crypto hack losses hit $112.5m in first two months of 2026, PeckShield data

Crypto hack losses hit $112.5m in first two months of 2026, PeckShield data

AMBCryptoAMBCrypto2026/03/02 17:51
By:AMBCrypto

Crypto-related hacks resulted in

$112.53 million
in losses across January and February 2026, according to data shared by PeckShield. 

While February recorded a sharp month-on-month decline in losses, the combined figures show that security incidents continue to pose a material risk early in the year.

January losses dominated by a handful of large exploits

January 2026 accounted for the bulk of losses, with

16 hacks totaling $86.01 million
. It represents a
1.42% year-on-year decline
from January 2025’s
$87.25 million
.

Losses were also 13.25% higher month-on-month
compared with December 2025, when $75.95 million was stolen.

The top five incidents in January were highly concentrated.

Step Finance
led with
$28.9 million
, followed by
Truebit at $26.4 million
and
SwapNet at $13.3 million
. 

Saga
reported losses of
$7 million
, while
Makina Finance lost $4.13 million
, of which
$2.7 million
was later recovered. 

Beyond protocol exploits, PeckShield noted that

phishing-related losses exceeded $300 million
during the month. This underscores the scale of social-engineering risks alongside smart contract vulnerabilities.

February sees sharp pullback but continued concentration

In

February 2026
, the crypto sector recorded
15 major hacks totaling $26.52 million
. This marks a
69.2% decline from January
and a
98.2% year-on-year decrease compared with February 2025
. 

The annual comparison is heavily influenced by the

$1.4 billion Bybit-related exploit
recorded last year, which inflated the 2025 baseline.

Despite the lower aggregate figure, losses in February were again dominated by a small number of incidents. 

Crypto hack losses hit $112.5m in first two months of 2026, PeckShield data image 0

Source: X

The

top five hacks accounted for approximately 98% of total stolen funds, or about $25.86 million
.
YieldBlox DAO
was the largest single incident at
$10 million
, followed by the
IoTeX bridge at $8.8 million
. 

CrossCurve lost $4.95 million
,
FOOM Cash reported $2.26 million
, and
Moonwell accounted for $1.8 million
.

Early 2026 data points to volatility rather than resolution

Taken together, the January and February figures highlight a pattern of loss concentration and volatility, rather than a sustained reduction in risk. 

While February’s decline suggests fewer high-severity exploits, the persistence of mid-sized protocol and bridge attacks indicates that systemic vulnerabilities remain unresolved, particularly in cross-chain infrastructure and DeFi applications.

Final Summary

  • Crypto hacks resulted in $112.53 million in losses across the first two months of 2026, with January accounting for more than three-quarters of the total.
  • February losses fell sharply month-on-month, but a small number of incidents still dominated overall damage, highlighting ongoing concentration risk.

 

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

Has the AI bubble burst? Goldman Sachs: It's more like 1998 than 2000 right now

The Goldman Sachs trading desk stated that the current wave of sell-offs resembles the 1998 liquidity crisis more than the bursting of the 2000 bubble. It is a forced deleveraging rather than a refutation of business fundamentals. The market is drastically repricing construction financing and timeline expectations, rather than underlying demand. Moreover, the issues currently drawing the most attention from the market—electricity and licensing—are actually the least important, as limited supply does not equate to disappearing demand. The real question that needs to be answered is whether long-term revenues can ultimately justify the capital invested.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/07 08:26
Has the AI bubble burst? Goldman Sachs: It's more like 1998 than 2000 right now

Tesla Cybertruck: From Cracked Windows to Production Halt, a Three-and-a-Half Year Journey Ends

Since its launch in 2019, Cybertruck has been mired in controversy—ranging from a failed window demonstration on release day, a four-year delay in mass production, and its price rising from $39,900 to more than $100,000, along with a total of 11 recalls. The day before the halt of production was announced, Tesla raised the price once again, bringing a dramatic and intriguing end to the saga of this vehicle.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/07 04:21
Tesla Cybertruck: From Cracked Windows to Production Halt, a Three-and-a-Half Year Journey Ends