The American Bankers Association warns that the Clarity Act may trigger a "deposit flight" to stablecoins.
According to ChainCatcher, as reported by CoinDesk, the American Bankers Association (ABA) is intensifying its lobbying efforts, urging the Senate to further tighten the stablecoin yield provisions in the Clarity Act. The ABA stated that the current version still allows yield-bearing stablecoins similar to "interest," which could replace insured bank deposits and weaken sources of credit funds such as mortgages and business loans. Although the bill has introduced a compromise that bans stablecoin yields similar to deposit interest, allowing only activity rewards similar to credit card points, several banking industry groups, including the ABA, are still calling to close the so-called "yield loophole" to prevent the stablecoin market value from rapidly expanding from approximately $30 billion to as much as $2 trillion, increasing pressure on the liability side of banks and slowing the broader crypto legislative process.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Pyth October Report: ARR Jumps 18.9% as Data Expansion Accelerates

Elon Musk: SpaceX (SPCX.US) Q4 revenue is expected to increase by approximately 70% quarter-on-quarter, with government contract income share falling below 10%
Elon Musk stated on Friday that SpaceX (SPCX.US) will continue to reduce its dependence on U.S. government procurement contracts.

After the sharp decline in tech stocks, the White House suddenly canceled the top tech advisor meeting the following day.
The White House has canceled the previously scheduled President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology meeting, which was set for Friday and includes prominent tech leaders such as Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg. The Department of Energy's meeting page briefly listed November 13 as the new meeting date, but the agency later sent an email retracting this information. Currently, the specific date for rescheduling the meeting remains unclear.

